Localization: A Shift in Power Dynamics
Understanding the Role of Grassroots Organizations in Sustainable Change
As I sit here at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), I find myself grappling with a mix of hope and frustration. This year, I made the decision to attend — something I usually shy away from due to the staggering costs associated with these gatherings. The money spent to convene heads of state could be channeled into addressing the very issues we discuss. And as climate week unfolds, I can’t help but reflect on the irony of the CO2 emissions generated by flying so many people together to talk about climate change.
In the few sessions I’ve attended, I’ve noticed a growing conversation around localization. Multilateral organizations and major foundations are increasingly recognizing the importance of partnering with local organizations. But what does localization truly mean? It’s not simply about allocating funds to organizations on the ground; it goes far deeper than that.
Localization is about recognizing grassroots organizations and their leaders as the true sources of knowledge and drivers of change. Too often, donors wield their funding as a means of control, dictating how and where resources should be allocated without fully understanding the context or needs of the communities they aim to serve. This mindset undermines the very essence of localization.
To genuinely localize means shifting power dynamics at all levels. It requires bringing decision-making authority back to the communities and individuals who are at the forefront of change. Donors often approach with a “best practices” mentality, armed with data and resources, believing they have the answers. However, lived experience is the best teacher. No amount of data can replace the insights gained from those who have navigated the challenges firsthand.
If we want to truly localize, we must be willing to co-create with grassroots organizations. This means being open to learning from them and accepting that they possess valuable knowledge that can enhance our understanding of the issues at hand. It’s a call for humility in our approach — acknowledging that we don’t have all the answers and that the path to effective change is paved through collaboration and mutual respect.
As we move forward in these discussions at UNGA and beyond, let’s commit to redefining our understanding of localization. It’s about power-sharing, trust, and recognizing the intrinsic value of local knowledge. Only then can we hope to create lasting change that truly reflects the needs and aspirations of the communities we aim to uplift.
